⚡ Ecological Intelligence Platform

Measure the
True Ecological
Cost of Energy.

EcoFlux quantifies the full environmental footprint of every energy source — from cradle to grave. Reorder biodiversity, cost, and CO₂ priorities first, then let the model surface the best-fit solution mix for your constraints.

20+
Energy Sources
6
Impact Dimensions
100%
Science-Backed
ECOLOGICAL SCORE
Solar PV · 1MW Farm
DEMO
92
/100
CO₂ Lifecycle20g/kWh
Land UseLow
Water IntensityMinimal
Biodiversity RiskLow
Live calculation · Updated May 2026
PRIORITY LAB

Choose what matters
before comparing solutions.

Start by ranking your decision criteria. Drag the blocks on desktop, or use the arrow controls to reorder them on any device.

First block = strongest weight in the recommendation engine

  1. 01
    Habitats first

    Lowest Biodiversity Impact

    Reduce land fragmentation, habitat stress, and pressure on local ecosystems.

  2. 02
    Capex aware

    Lowest Cost

    Favor the option with the strongest price profile once ecological constraints are met.

  3. 03
    Portfolio carbon

    Lowest CO2 Mix

    Optimize the overall energy mix for the lowest lifecycle CO2 intensity.

LIVE RECOMMENDATION
Current priority order

1. Minimize biodiversity pressure / 2. Protect project budget / 3. Reduce portfolio CO2

Recommended first pick

Onshore Wind

Strong lifecycle carbon performance with limited land sealing and low operating cost.

21.5fit score
Biodiversity
18/100
Cost index
34/100
CO2 intensity
11g/kWh

Primary weight on minimize biodiversity pressure, with protect project budget next.

Suggested portfolio mix
Onshore Wind
Best biodiversity fit
48%
Utility Solar
Fast deployment
32%
Nuclear
Stable low-carbon baseload
20%
Scenario ranking
#1

Onshore Wind

Strong lifecycle carbon performance with limited land sealing and low operating cost.

21.5
fit score
#2

Utility Solar

Competitive pricing and low operational emissions, with careful siting required for land use.

30
fit score
#3

Nuclear

Very low lifecycle CO2 and strong reliability, though with higher upfront investment.

33.1
fit score
#4

Geothermal

Predictable low-carbon output with moderate cost and localized environmental constraints.

34.2
fit score
#5

Run-of-river Hydro

Solid carbon profile but biodiversity pressure rises when waterways are highly constrained.

41.9
fit score
#6

Gas Peaker Backup

Lowest entry cost for flexibility, but high lifecycle emissions reduce its fit in cleaner mixes.

127.1
fit score
HOW IT WORKS

From source to score
in three steps.

01
STEP 01

Rank Priorities

Reorder biodiversity, cost, and CO2 impact so the engine weights your real decision logic first.

02
STEP 02

Compare Scenarios

Stress-test multiple technologies against the ranked criteria and spot the strongest trade-offs.

03
STEP 03

Review the Best Mix

Get a shortlist and a portfolio mix aligned with the ordering you chose at the start.

SUPPORTED SOURCES

Every source.
Honestly scored.

No greenwashing. No oversimplification. EcoFlux models the full lifecycle of each energy technology across all environmental dimensions.

Clean

Solar

20g CO₂/kWh
92
Clean

Wind

11g CO₂/kWh
95
Low carbon

Nuclear

12g CO₂/kWh
75
Renewable

Hydro

24g CO₂/kWh
78
Fossil

Natural Gas

490g CO₂/kWh
38
Fossil

Coal

820g CO₂/kWh
8

+ 14 more sources including geothermal, tidal, biomass, and hydrogen

EARLY ACCESS

Be the first to
know the true cost.

Join the waitlist. Get early access to EcoFlux before public launch, plus our free guide on reading ecological scores.

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime. We respect your data.